Click here for English Version
Read More at »
Stamford-PMG-System-Permanent-Magnet-Generator-.jpg (JPEG Image, 502×376 pixels)
Micro-Hydro Water Turbines for Home Power | Alternative & Renewable Energy - ABS Alaskan, Inc.
A small team of engineers in Cornwall has made a breakthrough with the development of a turbine that they claim could solve the commercial viability of tidal power.
The main complication of a Wind Funnel is to turn the entire thing into the
A small aerodynamically perfect
A small aerodynamically perfect wind turbine design is easy to build. The
turbine would rotate fairly fast.
Two types of vertical axis wind turbines, Savonius and Darius, are mostly used. The Savonius wind turbine was invented by Sigrid Savonius of Finland. Although, the Savonius type of vertical axis windmill less efficient than a conventional design but it does not need to be kept in a single direction. With simple junk like oil drums, car alternator or dynamo, you can build wind generator. This is wind generator will charge 200 watts battery.
Characteristics of Savonius Wind Turbines
Savonius wind turbines are not needed to be installed on high towers and polarity or direction of the wind turbine does not change with the direction of wind and over the land surface and Roof-top installation is normally used. Materials and construction cost is much lower than horizontal axis wind turbines. Split a barrel into half and putting together these two vertically split halves to a vertical axis. This creates a low speed high torque unit that can be utilized for driving water and through a gearing mechanism, generate electricity.
This design works on "magnus principal", an aerodynamic effect. The most everywhere usage of the Savonius wind turbine is the Flettner Ventilator. It employs the design of Savonius wind turbine to drive an extractor fan.
Here is a DIY Project for wind turbine alternator.
The alternator has two 12 inch diameter rotors that each have 12 neodymium disk magnets measuring 1.47 inche in diameter and .6 inches thick. Between the rotors is the stator consisting of 9 coils of awg #20 wire, 200 turns each. The coils are arranged to produce 3-phase ac. Each phase has 3 coils wired in series. There are 3 full wave bridge rectifiers, one for each phase. Each is isolated from the other. All three rectified dc outputs are wired together in parallel and the dc is sent via cable to the battery bank.
The stator is made by sandwiching the coils between two pieces of epoxy fiber glass board, the kind used in the manufacture of printed circuit boards. The top and bottom sheets, each 1/16 inch thick, are held together with bolts. They have reinforcing ribs added for stiffness. Power is brought out by means of stainless steel machine screws.
If you’d like to build one yourself, you must know it can theoretically produce 316W, by the formula:
"Watts = Conversion constant * Betz limit * efficiency * area in sq. m * wind^3
In a perfectly efficient turbine,
Watts = .05472 * 59% * 100% * 4.46 * 13^3 =316 watts"
Use these powerful permanent magnet alternators (PMA’s) to make cheap electricity from Wind, Hydro, Steam and Bio-Diesel power systems. Hornet permanent magnet alternators are by no means standard "Automotive" alternators containing brushes and electro-magnetic coils. A PMA does not waste power by having to continuously create an energy intensive magnetic field. Stop wasting up to 50% of your power energizing the coil of standard brush type alternators. Get a real PMA!
PMA Models:Super Core PMA’s (For use with the Hornet 1000watt Turbine)
SC12
SC24
SC48
SC60
SC120
Slant Core PMA’s (For use with the Hornet 600watt Turbine)
SCS12
SCS24
SCS48
The range of STK Permanent Magnet frameless alternators addresses the applications of Wind Turbine generators in low and medium power needing the highest power-to-weight ratio in Direct Drive without gear for matching cost-effective solutions.
Each component of a wind turbine generator and wind turbine alternator requires maximum strength and precision in order to ensure perfect control over the blades.
Technorati : Direct Drive, Permanent magnets, alternators, frameless
Del.icio.us : Direct Drive, Permanent magnets, alternators, frameless
Zooomr : Direct Drive, Permanent magnets, alternators, frameless
Flickr : Direct Drive, Permanent magnets, alternators, frameless
Here is a collection of access to NREL-developed wind resource maps and atlases for several countries. NREL also provides access to maps available from the Asia Alternative Energy Program (ASTAE) and the Solar and Wind Energy Resource Assessment (SWERA). The SWERA Link includes solar maps as well as the wind maps, GIS data, interactive maps, and country reports. Some of the following documents are available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs. Download Adobe Reader.
The Solar and Wind Energy Resource Assessment (SWERA) provides information about solar and wind energy resources in thirteen partner countries around the world. Products include data on wind and solar energy potential, plus detailed country energy analyses. SWERA is a UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) project with co-financing from Global Environment Facility (GEF). The goal is to provide solar and wind energy assessments to potential investors and the public to promote more effective use of alternative energy resources.
Asia Alternative Energy Program (ASTAE) maintains the Wind Energy Resource Atlas of South Asia. The atlas covers four countries: Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, and Vietnam. The purpose of the atlas is to facilitate the development of wind energy both for utility-scale generation and for village power and other off-grid applications.
You need a SATA controller to attache SATA hard drive. Lots of motherboards come with these on board in addition to the EIDE and cards are available. The technologies don't conflict, but they are definitely not interchangeable. SATA transferring data faster, but is only 7 pin connector. how come can be faster than 80 conductor IDE? (i also understand that USB is faster than parellel port, but still wanna know the technical issue inside.)
http://www.maxtor.com/en/technologies/serial_ata/faq.htm
Be aware with SATA, most of the bios needs upgrade even if they have SATA controller on that. High-end motherboards use the ICH5 Southbridge (part of Intel 875P chipset). ICH5 has 2 SATA ports integrated. Silicon Image is another chip manufacturer used for on-board SATA support.
Right now the speed difference between SATA-150 and ATA-133 or ATA-100 is negligible. Even 7200rpm drives can't usually sustain more than 50 megabytes/sec of transfer anyway, let alone 100, 133, or 150MB/sec.
Obviously the extra bandwidth comes into play when you've got multiple devices on a single IDE channel but if performance was really that critical you'd have every device on its own connector.
The SATA connectors are much more convenient, the cost increase now is negligable (and will flip as time goes on), and the ceiling is much, much higher. SATA has none of PATA's limitations.
But should you replace PATA drives today with SATA drives? No. Should you consider using SATA if you get a new PC or motherboard with SATA support, and you have to buy drives anyway?
You can also buy adapters between SATA and EIDE. I'm not sure all configurations are supported, but you should be able to go between EIDE connectors on the motherboard and a SATA drive.
Regarding performance of SATA drives: http://research.microsoft.com/~Gray/papers/MSR_TR_2003_70_%20SATAPerformance.pdf
A Quick Look at SATA Disk Performance
We have been investigating the use of low-cost, commodity components for multi-terabyte SQL Server databases. Dubbed Storage Bricks, these servers are white box PCs containing the largest ATA drives, value-priced AMD or Intel processors, and inexpensive ECC memory. One issue has been the wiring mess, air flow problems, length restrictions, and connector failures created by seven or more Parallel ATA (PATA) ribbon cables and drives. Large capacity Serial ATA (SATA) drives have recently become widely available for the PC environment at a reasonable price (1k$/TB). In addition to being faster, the SATA connectors seem more reliable, have a more reasonable length restriction (1m) and allow better airflow. We tested two drive brands along with two RAID controllers to evaluate SATA drive performance and reliability. Each disk delivers about 50 MBps sequential and about 75 read IOps and 130 write IOps on random IO. The cards saturate at 200MBps on sequential but scale linearly to 8 disks for random IO. A surprise is that software RAID1 generally performs best and is easiest to manage."
"You can also buy adapters between SATA and EIDE. But it is not sure all configurations are supported, but you should be able to go between EIDE connectors on the motherboard and a SATA drive".I've accidentally ruined so many PATA cables (by pulling the socket thing off the ribbon) that I was really looking forward to SATA... But alas, the SATA connector is still a flimsy little plastic thing. It doesn't even lock in place.
I'm not sure what the whole point of ATA is these days; why not just use FireWire? (probably because the controller needed between the bus and the disk is still fairly expensive... but it would be so much nicer to run your whole storage system on one or more hot-plug FireWire buses)
Out of curiosity, if more people used SCSI, would the prices come down to IDE levels? Or do the drive electronics mandate a minimum pricing?
The cost difference between SCSI and IDE drives is not just the interface. Largely it is the market targeted by the drive makers. They design their SCSI drives for business use, and therefore make them more reliable and faster. IDE drives are for consumer use so they are made to be as inexpensive as possible.
It is possible to make SATA drives on par with SCSI drives, for a price. I imagine it would be possible to make SCSI drives almost as cheap as IDE drives, but it is not worth it since there is not a mass market for SCSI drives, especially now with SATA.
I have heard that the Western Digital Raptors (the 10K SATA drives) actual share drive hardware with their SCSI cousins, which is why they're available in the common SCSI sizes (36GB and 72GB) and not in the more typical PATA sizes.
The biggest question most of we can't answer is the difference between SATA and PATA or as the techno-weenies call it "regular hard drives". Because this forum pretty much saves me about a 15 to 25 minute education process for customers, I would like to thank you guys for having this thread up here for me to print and hand to people and let the PEBKACs slowly do the math themselves. On a slightly related note tho...I haven't seen much thought being put out on one potential for SATA...I could be wrong but listen for a minute...the S in SATA is Serial..we have had serial ports for awhile and know how they work..USB (still a Serial Bus) made things easier..one of the nice things about USB being on a "serial bus" its biggest point of sale is "hot swapable" And from what I have been reading about all of the PCI-X stuff..being that everything there is going to be a serial bus..the most simple things like sound cards/modems/nics/ EVEN Video cards are gonna be hot swappable.
Granted that its not the primary drive that you have booted from and are now using an operating system on...would your SATA drive currently be hot swapable...or is that something that is currently limited by todays Parrallel interface bus south bridges. Or am i the first to ask that? (on a related note i know i have lost any and all ability to spell).
Some people said that PATA is faster than SATA, in some case.
but the technical note, certified that SATA is much more better than PATA. How is the PATA works when transferring data with 80 conductor IDE cable?
The price diffential between PATA Seagate 120Gb and SATA. Seagate 120GB(2mb, I haven't checked out 8mbs yet) is nearly 15%, 4400 bucks to 5600 bucks. Also whats the advantages and Disadvantages of Maxtor vs. Seagate. I also hear a lot of scare stories of how the PATA 2mb 120gb seagate is crashing a lot. Anyone heard anything?